• Hello and welcome to MSFC. We are a small and close knitted community who specialises in modding the game Star Trek Armada 2 and the Fleet Operations modification, however we have an open field for discussing a number of topics including movies, real life events and everything in-between.

    Being such a close community, we do have some restrictions, including all users required to be registered before being able to post as well as all members requiring to have participated in the community for sometime before being able to download our modding files to name the main ones. This is done for both the protection of our members and to encourage new members to get involved with the community. We also require all new registrations to first be authorised by an Administrator and to also have an active and confirmed email account.

    We have a policy of fairness and a non harassment environment, with the staff quick to act on the rare occasion of when this policy is breached. Feel free to register and join our community.

Design the Next Enterprise Contest

CABAL

<< ■ II ▶ >>
Staff member
Administrator
Star Navigator
Rogue AI technocrat
Joined
15 Aug 2009
Messages
3,511
Age
33
...that tail looks more like something that due to this being a family site I can not say...

You know, I didn't even notice that until you mentioned it and now I can't un-notice it. That's kind of disturbing.
 

Adm_Z

Gettin' down and GUI!
Joined
23 Nov 2009
Messages
2,745
I'm all for an STO shun.:D I can't afford to play it anyway.:lol2:
 

Terra_Inc

MSFC's Cheshire Cat
Staff member
Site Manager
Necromancer/Troll hunter
Kitten Commander
Joined
16 Dec 2009
Messages
3,137
Age
34
You know, I didn't even notice that until you mentioned it and now I can't un-notice it. That's kind of disturbing.

What has been seen can not be unseen. :shock: I fail a SAN roll.
 

SciFiFan

MSFC Hunter Vanguard
Staff member
Forum Moderator
Lone Star Hunter
Joined
13 May 2009
Messages
2,087
Age
45
Alright, I will be the black sheep of the MSFC family and say I will not boycott Cryptic. They are really in between a rock and a hard place. They are trying to cater to two different types of people (in some areas succeeding and others failing). On one end you have the hard core Star Trek fan and on the other the hard core MMO player. Quite honestly I think they are doing a fine job at keeping that balance. There is a lot of "cannon" that they are ignoring but, face it, Star Trek ignored its own cannon on several occasions.

As for the next Enterprise, was not my first choice either. I don't think it is ugly but, it does lack that elegance. The color over was another artist's iteration. The clay model at the bottom of that page came after the color over. Here are some remarks I would like to point out.

"I came into the process after some iterating had been done on the concept between Jeremy and Thomas." -This shows that the color over is just another person's concept.

"Moving forward, it was important that we keep the faceting to a minimum, lengthen the body lines, and soften the curves for that sculpted, designed look, all the while ensuring it maintained the look of the Federation’s flagship." -This tells me that perhaps the unmentionable at the back is not on the clay model. Obviously I can not say for sure but, without a view of the back end of the clay model, no one can.

And lastly this.

"However, I also had to keep in mind that there was a concept I needed to be very true to, more specifically the ¾ perspective and the profile provided by our winner." -Yes he made changes to the nacelles and some other tweaks but, overall I think it is true to the original concept.

I am by no means trying to play devil's advocate. All I am suggesting that we see this thing to the end and then make our minds up.

Also, if you are leaving the game, I just would like you to consider the reason that you are doing it.
 

Majestic

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Seraphim Build Team
Joined
17 Apr 2006
Messages
18,325
Age
39
Sure that's not Sheilas as well on the Grumpy, short and very sensitive about their weight part ;)

Both really. :thumbsup:

C
Just curious about this, though, Majestic:

Is this boycott a personal one or a MSFC policy? Because I think I can get behind the idea of a boycott quite easily. I would politely recommend it be submitted to the MSFC membership generally for consideration. I think a lot of us feel the same way, especially after seeing how they've bungled absolutely everything they've come in contact so far. I've never seen a group of developers that made Mad Doc look organized by comparison....

It's just a personal one, one I don't expect anything to agree with or join. With that competition only available to some US states and not to their entire consumer base and now this, has made my mind up about this company. It's a personal opinion, one that doesn't influence STO here at MSFC, if people still want to post threads and screenshots about it by all means they can and should.

It's a free country... um site after all. :thumbsup:

Oh yes unorganised, I seriously don't know how they have lasted this long.

Alright, I will be the black sheep of the MSFC family and say I will not boycott Cryptic.

I'm not asking you to boycott mate, just saying I will. This is just a personal opinion and if you enjoy the game then that's great, at least some of us do. :thumbsup:
 

SciFiFan

MSFC Hunter Vanguard
Staff member
Forum Moderator
Lone Star Hunter
Joined
13 May 2009
Messages
2,087
Age
45
Here is Part 3 of the Dev Diary for the Enterprise F. I am not sure if it is just the angle or if they made some additional tweaks but, it does look better than it did in the last installment.

Also on a side note: Season 4: Crossfire is now live. Check out the changes here.

Edit: Here is a look at multiple angles of the Enterprise F.
 

Styer_Crisis

Zero APM Gamer, And i can still own you
Joined
9 Mar 2011
Messages
368
Age
29
Here is Part 3 of the Dev Diary for the Enterprise F. I am not sure if it is just the angle or if they made some additional tweaks but, it does look better than it did in the last installment.

Also on a side note: Season 4: Crossfire is now live. Check out the changes here.

Edit: Here is a look at multiple angles of the Enterprise F.

I don't know if i'm losing my mind or what, but i really like this ship, it has to be one of my top ten favorate designs for a federation ship, ever.
 

Adm_Z

Gettin' down and GUI!
Joined
23 Nov 2009
Messages
2,745
It looks much better.:thumbsup: No tail, better naclles, inset impulse engines with a singular one for seperation I presume, the 'mouth' is better, overall, huge improvements. I might have to take back what I said earlier if they continue with these kinds of improvements.:thumbsup:

However... It does seem to resemble this ship more and more.:naughty: Contest Submissions | startrekonline.com
 

CABAL

<< ■ II ▶ >>
Staff member
Administrator
Star Navigator
Rogue AI technocrat
Joined
15 Aug 2009
Messages
3,511
Age
33
It's still much different from the design they picked, but they did go back on some of their more ridiculous changes so it's starting to look very nice, in my opinion.
 

Majestic

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Seraphim Build Team
Joined
17 Apr 2006
Messages
18,325
Age
39
It looks much better.:thumbsup: No tail, better naclles, inset impulse engines with a singular one for seperation I presume, the 'mouth' is better, overall, huge improvements. I might have to take back what I said earlier if they continue with these kinds of improvements.:thumbsup:

It's still much different from the design they picked, but they did go back on some of their more ridiculous changes so it's starting to look very nice, in my opinion.

I must agree, it's much better now and if they keep moving in this direction it may be the real really good Federation model that they have made for the game. I am now a lot more positive about this design, let's hope they don't stuff it up again. :thumbsup:
 
S

StarBlade

Deleted Due to Inactivity
Former MSFC Member
No, it's still a derivative, jagged looking design and I see nothing to commend it. As long as the back end of the stardrive looks like it does, I won't like this one, either. That's just tasteless, I'm sorry. As to the rest of the ship, it's like a Vesta / Sovereign hybrid, and since I don't like the Vesta, I also don't like the lines of this one. There's just too many unnecessary sweeping lines and graphic-designer details for me to ever accept this as a working, operational Starfleet design. It just doesn't work for me. But then, I'm not their target audience, am I?
 

Hellkite

Lord of Death
Staff member
Administrator
Seraphim Build Team
Star Fighter
Joined
23 Apr 2006
Messages
7,650
I have a question.

Why did they even have the contest ? If they are just going to to change the wining design into what ever they see fit :confused:
 

Majestic

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Seraphim Build Team
Joined
17 Apr 2006
Messages
18,325
Age
39
I have a question.

Why did they even have the contest ? If they are just going to to change the wining design into what ever they see fit :confused:

Because they wanted to give the illusion that they actually cared about and wanted the input of the community and their consumers. That or their art department lacks any real skill.
 

Hellkite

Lord of Death
Staff member
Administrator
Seraphim Build Team
Star Fighter
Joined
23 Apr 2006
Messages
7,650
I will go with both of those reasons
 

Majestic

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Seraphim Build Team
Joined
17 Apr 2006
Messages
18,325
Age
39
Some aspects I like, other I hate, so all in all not too bad, we could've had a really bad design, one that wouldn't fit at all and there are a few of those in STO already. So yeah not bad at all. I may look into making my own version down the track sometime.
 
S

StarBlade

Deleted Due to Inactivity
Former MSFC Member
I didn't think it possible that I'd dislike this design any more, but then, lookit that. It looks like they sliced the ship in two along the center-line and grafted another stardrive into the middle. And it's still got that feminine --shall we say-- aft quarter of the stardrive! Gah. This has moved from 'terrible' to 'disgusting'.

But we all knew what I think.
 

Majestic

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Seraphim Build Team
Joined
17 Apr 2006
Messages
18,325
Age
39
Yeah that aft bit really needs changing, a shuttle bay there like on the Sovereign/Constitution would've been a much better alternative to that bit.
 

Styer_Crisis

Zero APM Gamer, And i can still own you
Joined
9 Mar 2011
Messages
368
Age
29
wow, i'm really impressed (i mean this is cryptic were talking about). said it before and i'll say it again: i like the design, i think its good and very representitive of the evolution of the line.
 

Lord_Trekie

Bah Humbug!
Joined
1 Oct 2006
Messages
1,876
When I saw the initial 2d representation I wasn't much a fan of the design, but the 3d model has grown on me. :)
 
A

Atlantisbase

Deleted Due to Inactivity
Former MSFC Member
There are things that don't look too bad. The saucer doesn't actually look half bad; nor the deflector area. But the link between the stardrive and saucer is horrible and the stardrive section looks really weird from that lower 3/4 angle in the main shot. The nacelles don't look too bad either.

In the end I think the "oos" and "ughs" cancel out leaving things at "meh". So not a terrible ship but I don't think it's worthy of the name "Enterprise".
 

CABAL

<< ■ II ▶ >>
Staff member
Administrator
Star Navigator
Rogue AI technocrat
Joined
15 Aug 2009
Messages
3,511
Age
33
It's much better than some of the other stuff they churned out making this ship, but it's still very different from the original concept drawing and is too much like a Sovereign in some ways. In the end, it lost much of what made it unique and I find that to be disappointing.
 

Terra_Inc

MSFC's Cheshire Cat
Staff member
Site Manager
Necromancer/Troll hunter
Kitten Commander
Joined
16 Dec 2009
Messages
3,137
Age
34
Overall, I don't like how they made it a Sovereign-lookalike, with the ovoid saucer and stuffs. And the "shuttle bay", wtf is this? Lulz. But man, that front view doesn't look too bad. ;)
 

SciFiFan

MSFC Hunter Vanguard
Staff member
Forum Moderator
Lone Star Hunter
Joined
13 May 2009
Messages
2,087
Age
45

K_merse

Star Trek: Evolution
Joined
22 Feb 2008
Messages
438
Looks much better and form certain angles it looks graceful. However, they would ahve to do something with the neck and the back of the saucer, because it ruins the whole illusion...
 

Adm_Z

Gettin' down and GUI!
Joined
23 Nov 2009
Messages
2,745
Agreed. the rear top angle is terrible, but it looks great from every other one.:cool:
 

Hellkite

Lord of Death
Staff member
Administrator
Seraphim Build Team
Star Fighter
Joined
23 Apr 2006
Messages
7,650
It still not worthy of the name :yuck:
 
T

thunderfoot

Deleted Due to Inactivity
Former MSFC Member
I dunno. I want to like it, but I am torn beyween my natural desire to support Star Trek and my disgust HK's design wasn't chosen. This is nice if someone wants a dual necked Sovvy wannabe. And if all I knew about Star Trek came only from the Reboot and STO, I guess I'd be happy with it.
 
Top